Currently, there are no strict laws in America requiring ammunition to have serial numbers. Those in favor of stricter gun laws have suggested requiring serial numbers to be engraved on ammunition would help keep track of who is buying bullets and help solve crimes. While this is the main benefit, there are many cons to making serial numbers on ammo a requirement.
The NRA points out that this could mean many detrimental consequences for law-abiding gun owners such as “forfeiture of currently-owned ammunition, a separate registration for every box of new ammunition, outrageously expensive ammunition costs for police and private citizens alike, and a waste of taxpayer money better spent on traditional police programs”.
They make a great argument to oppose requiring serial numbers on ammunition because all of these factors will affect the people who follow the laws, such as hunters, or those who own guns for target shooting or personal protection, while criminals could easily beat the system. “A large percentage of criminals’ ammunition (and guns) is stolen. Criminals could also collect ammunition cases from shooting ranges, and reload them with molten lead bullets made without serial numbers.”
Other opponents, such as gun shop owners say this would not be worth all the extra paperwork they would be required to do. Not only that, but the NRA continues to explain, “The cost of ammunition would soar, for police and private citizens alike. The Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturing Institute estimates it would take three weeks to produce ammunition currently produced in a single day. For reason of cost, manufacturers would produce only ultra-expensive encoded ammunition, which police would have to buy, just like everyone else.”
At first glance, some might think its a good way to keep track of ammunition purchases, but when you look deeper, a lot would go into making serial numbers on bullets a requirement.